Annotated Bibliography
Pramod K. Nayar. “The Postcolonial Uncanny: The Politics of Dispossession in Amitav Ghosh’s the Hungry Tide.” College Literature, vol. 37, no. 4, 2010, pp. 88–119, https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2010.0011. Accessed 14 Nov. 2019.
This article examines the boundaries of the homely and unhomely in the context of the postcolonial within Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide. He uses some psychoanalytic and poststructuralist theory to argue that ways of knowing within the novel precede mere knowledge. The use in my project will be in terms of further exploring of his idea of “the indigenous canny”, and how it formulates a less problematic way of knowing.
Ratté , Lou . “Unlikely Encounters:Fiction and Scientific Discourse in the Novels of Amitav Ghosh.” History, Narrative, and Testimony in Amitav Ghosh’s Fiction, edited by Chitra Sankaran, State University of New York Press, 2012, pp. 17–32, www.jstor.org/stable/jj.18254311. Accessed 14 Nov. 2024.
Lou Ratte seeks to do something similar within his text that I will attempt in mine, namely examining the way certain scientific discourse in The Hungry Tide. He hits on three main points:the ways indigenous knowledge is are stolen to bolster Western science,the ways science affects local populations, and the undermining of native science models. Ultimately, although this text is historicizing, I mean to use it primarily to examine the way scientific discourses in postcoloniality.
White, Laura A. “Novel Vision: Seeing the Sunderbans through Amitav Ghosh’s ‘The Hungry Tide.’” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, vol. 20, no. 3, 2013, pp. 513–31. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44087261 . Accessed 14 Nov. 2024.
White’s article contends that the ways of knowing ,in a postcolonial context, are not about cold reason or dry empiricism but come phenomenologically. She is in conversation with another theorist we will also encounter in my essay, Walter Mignolo. She uses his concept of visual practices being another type of epistemology, rather than a perhaps a traditional philosophical dichotomy of “seeing vs knowing” . This will be one of my main pieces to think with as it gets to the heart of what I seek to argue; namely that are ways of knowing outside of Western models of postcoloniality.
Alcoff, Linda Martín . “Mignolo’s Epistemology of Coloniality.” CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 7, no. 3, 2008, pp. 79–101, https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.0.0008 .
Hunter College’s very own Linda Alcoff details here a comprehensive overview of Walter Mignolo’s decolonial epistemology alongside explorations of Foucault. She relates power systems and the way knowledge gets imposed through discourse, specifically under postcolonialism. This will be the main theoretical piece I will work with. Alcoff is a philosopher and Mignolo is a semiotician/philosopher so the interdisciplinary nature of this piece fits perfectly for the research project, which explores philosophy and literature, as means to discuss epistemology.
Wilburn, Heather. “An Introduction to Western Epistemology.” Open.library.okstate.edu, Tulsa Community College, 18 Jan. 2021, open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/an-introduction-to-western-epistemology/.
My project is written with other literary critics in mind of course and most critics have at least a vague notion of certain classic epistemological concepts in Western philosophy. Nonetheless, Heather Wilburn’s introductory article, gives a concise and brief summary of major figures with epistemology. From Descartes to Hume, she covers the foundation by which Modern Western epistemology and philosophy was founded on.
Rohlf, Michael, “Immanuel Kant”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/kant/>
I likewise wanted to provide a brief overview on Kant, as he is one of the biggest, if not the biggest Western philosopher ever. The article by Wilburn does not provide an adequate overview on Kant’s philosophy, so for the purposes on my research I will instead use this one.
Ghosh, Amitav. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Ghosh’s section , Fictions, is where he gets most in depth about the problems of narrative and epistemology. Specifically he hones in on how knowing, seeing, and imaging are not necessarily different categories, but are essential to understanding the impending climate crisis we face. He like White historicizes, but specifically discusses the geological history of Bangladesh, and critiques how we understand mass ‘disasters’. Knowing and narrative are key themes in both The Great Derangement and The Hungry Tide, so it is in my article that I want to keep these two works as companion pieces that play off each other.



